If you can't live with the lower resolution of the Sony's viewfinder or its distinctly clunky menu structure, the Nikon Z6 is our next choice, again for its all-round competence. Ultimately it would be our first choice because it's at least competitive in every one of the types of shooting we've looked at. Yet again, the longer battery life of the Sony can be a distinct advantage, along with it being as small and light as any of the cameras here. Travel is perhaps the most challenging use-case of them all, in part because it can encompass elements of just about all our other shooting scenarios, but with the added need to be compact and light enough to keep with you.
#FULL FRAME VS MIRRORLESS ISO#
ISO 100 | 1/3200 sec | F1.6 | Canon EOS R and Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM We found the autofocus 'wobble' the Panasonic gives in its viewfinder also made it hard to follow action, but it turns in a great hit rate. Both are generally better than the Nikon at subject tracking, but both are slower at continuous shooting.Ĭanon's tracking in particular works quite well, but its viewfinder refresh rate doesn't exactly help you follow what's going on. Canon comes next, with the Panasonic falling further behind, particularly with fast action. The Nikon is probably the next best performer with the fastest burst rates, though in this case we wouldn't depend so heavily on tracking in spite of significant improvements. Add to this the more extensive range of long telephoto lenses, better battery life and a sports-worthy burst rate, and you have a rare area in which one camera stands out. Sony's autofocus is the most dependable of the four, particularly in terms of subject tracking. None of these cameras are primarily designed to be sports cameras, but they can all acquit themselves pretty well if you do find yourself tracking along the sidelines of a sporting event. Panasonic Lumix DC-S1, though they're all very capable It also has the highest resolution viewfinder for previewing the scene, an HDR TV-compatible output mode for more striking stills and a multi-shot 96MP mode for boosting image quality in scenes where there's not too much movement. It's probably the easiest to operate with gloves on: it has enough dedicated controls that you need not use the touchscreen though, as with all these cameras, the buttons are quite small. The S1 has a number of factors that help it stand out, though. The Canon needs a high-current battery pack if you're going to top it up on-the-go, but there's not a lot to choose between them, beyond that. The Sony offers the best battery life, which minimizes the need to bring charged-up spares (hilltops at sunrise can be cold enough to significantly sap battery life). The S1 has a number of factors that help it stand out The Panasonic certainly feels the most rugged of the four. The Canon's higher resolution doesn't look to offer a significant increase in detail capture, certainly not enough to outweigh its slightly lower dynamic range retention.Īll four cameras promise a degree of environmental sealing though none of them are subject to specific claims or ratings, so it's best to take this with a pinch of salt. The more detail you can capture, and the more tolerant of challenging light your camera is, the more you'll have to show for the early mornings and distances walked to get the perfect shot.Īll four cameras do well.
Landscape shooting is primarily a question of outright image quality. ISO 100 | 1/400 sec | F16 | Canon EOS R and Canon RF 24-105mm F4L
0 kommentar(er)
